1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. Around June 1, 2018, the Plaintiff’s father, driving on the Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-si, Sinsan Sinsan-si, Sinsan-si,

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

Article 50 of the Road Act provides that "The standards for the structure, facilities, safety inspection, repair, maintenance, and management of roads shall be determined by Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, and shall be determined so as to minimize natural ecosystem damage and environmental damage of neighboring residents, etc. resulting from road works and ensure road structures and traffic safety."

(c) The detailed details of the location of a protective fence (this refers to a facility that has a function to induce drivers to stop the vehicle, to stop the vehicle's shock energy before the vehicle deviating from the main lane conflicts with the structure on the road, etc., or to return the vehicle to the main lane by correcting the direction of the vehicle to the main lane) as specified in the guidelines for the installation and management of road safety facilities, at the same time, to reduce the harm of passengers and the damage of the vehicle to a minimum extent, and to return the vehicle to the normal direction. The ancillary contents are as follows:

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 4 through 6, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination:

A. The plaintiff's assertion must install safety facilities such as direction signs or safety signs, protection fences, shock absorption facilities, etc. at the location of the accident of this case, but did not install them.

The plaintiff is driving a two-wheeled automobile due to such defects.

(e).