logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2016.07.05 2016고정237
명예훼손등
Text

Defendant

B shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Defendant

B If the above fine is not paid, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B around May 29, 2015, around 19:10, at the conference room of the 2nd floor of the Songpa-gu Seoul apartment management office, the victim E and the above D apartment reconstruction promotion committee, were carried out, and the victim E and A, who is the promotion committee for the reconstruction of the above D apartment, was pushed down in the chair of the victim, and then the victim was pushed down with the victim's chest part and the upper part of the upper part of the victim's chest, and caused the victim's injury, such as light dump, which requires treatment for up to 14 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant B's partial statement

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect against the defendant B;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to file a complaint, written diagnosis of injury, CCTV images, and investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and subparagraph B of the punishment for the crime: Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (Optional to the punishment);

1. Defendant B who is detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B: The part dismissing the public prosecution under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Summary of the facts charged against Defendant A

A. The Defendant is a person who is responsible for promoting the reconstruction of the Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government apartment.

On May 29, 2015, the Defendant: (a) in the meeting room of the second floor representative of the Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D Apartment Housing Management Office around 19:03, and (b) knowing that the victim E, the chairperson of the promotion committee for the reconstruction of the above apartment, has not received any benefit of defense expenses, total amount of membership fees, etc. from the reconstruction construction, the Defendant is aware that the inaugural general meeting that the E and Si Corporation is entrusted with the construction project is not always at the time of attendance

was dismissed.

E Holding an inaugural general meeting, disregarding all owners of DNA apartments, including an attorney-at-law, a full-time member, and a member of the Promotion Committee with the total membership fees;

“The content was broadcasted to the residents.”

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

B. The Defendant, at around May 29, 2015, listened to a broadcast after completing the broadcast at the place indicated in the above paragraph (a) at around 19:10 on May 29, 2015, and the victim who found the Defendant to the above place was cited by the Defendant.

arrow