Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On October 3, 2017, at the main point of "C" located in Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon, on October 3, 2017, the Defendant left a mixed person while drinking alcohol. The Defendant, along with the police officer who received a report from the owner of the above main station, was accompanied by the Daejeon Police Station E zone located in Seo-gu, Daejeon for the measure of returning home, etc.
On October 3, 2017, at around 05:17, the Defendant: (a) sounded a mobile phone inside the said district as “induction of tax base,” and obstructed police officers’ lawful execution of duties concerning police officers’ patrol and response of 112 reports by assaulting assaulting violence on the left face of the F that prevents him/her from carrying out the patrol of crime prevention and the duty of response to 112 reports while avoiding disturbance; (b) sound as “induction of tax base, induction of tax base,” and “induction of tax base, induction of tax base, in order to carry out the patrol of crime prevention and the duty of response to 112 reports.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the handling of reported cases to each investigation report, photographs, copies of the work site of E District, and 112;
1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the choice of punishment;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by this court as to the claim of mental disorder under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order, the defendant is deemed to have a certain degree of drinking at the time of the crime in this case, but in light of the circumstances such as the background leading to the crime in this case, the means and method of the crime, and the defendant's behavior before and after the crime in this case, it cannot be deemed that the defendant suffered from drinking or had no ability to discern things or make decisions, and therefore, the defendant's mental and physical disorder argument is without merit.
The grounds for sentencing are as follows: records and the defendant's age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime.