The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant: (a) deemed that the Defendant did not engage in any act that did not mean that he “the victim intends to see” himself; and (b) stated that “if he saw the snow in a luxus, he will take such a attitude”; and (c) did not perform any act that did not intend to see the snow in his hand; and (d) did not have any desire as stated in the facts of the crime.

Nevertheless, the lower court, which found the Defendant guilty, erred by misapprehending the facts charged, thereby affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The judgment of the court below is based on the evidence duly adopted and examined, i.e., ① the victim stated at the investigative agency that "I see the defendant's bath while doing so, I see it as "I see that I see that I see it, I see it, I see it as "I see it, I see it, I see it, I see it," and the defendant stated that I see that I see it as "I see it, I see it as I see it, I see it as I see it as I see, I see it as I see, I see that I see it as I see, I see that I see it as I see, I see it as I see, I see it as I see it as I see that I see it as I see it as I see that I see it as I see it."