logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.06.15 2017고단208
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years.

The defendant pays 26.2 million won to the applicant by fraud. This is the case.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] On March 10, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for embezzlement at the Gwangju District Court, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on July 26, 2016.

1. The criminal defendant against the victim C was a person who was operating a danran in the trade name of "E" located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, and was prepared to operate a danran bar additionally.

The Defendant, around July 2009, sent the victim C with a good salke bar in the “E” entertainment bar. The Defendant sent the victim C with good salke bar.

It is a business establishment that can increase sales of KRW 100 million per month.

In order to take over this business, a loan of KRW 500 million shall be made with business funds. The principal shall be repaid within six months and the interest shall be paid in two installments per month.

“A false statement” was made.

However, the Defendant, as a person of bad credit standing, was unable to repay the debt amounting to 53 million won at around April 2009, and has not been able to pay the principal and interest normally even if he borrowed money from the injured party.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim, obtained a total of KRW 350 million from the victim on November 6, 2009, KRW 230 million, and KRW 120 million from the police officer on December 2, 2009, and acquired KRW 350 million from the victim.

2. On September 5, 2010, the criminal defendant against the victim B is running a loan business in the form of a vehicle security loan in the “G” ranran bar operated by himself/herself in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F, and the victim B.

When the borrower applies for a loan as security on a vehicle, the borrower should pay the loan, and there is a lack of money to grant the loan.

The loan will be repaid in three-month unit, and five-month interest will be paid.

“A false statement” was made.

However, the Defendant was thought to use the money borrowed from the injured party as operating expenses of the said dan, and did not think that it was used for the vehicle security loan business, and borrowed money from C.

arrow