The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. The Defendant is an insurance solicitor.

(a) On December 201, 201, in French and Daegu (FFF) no authority is required for the purpose of exercising a private document forgery at the end of the end of the month, “the loan certificate, daily cash: KRW 13,00,000 (13,000), the date and time of the loan: C (D); C (F) on December 23, 201; E (F) G, H, creditors: A (I); and the Daegu-si JB/D; (25) on eight (8) annual interest rate; (3) the date of repayment: (1) on August 23, 2014, the same person’s seal is affixed to the name next to the name of the above C; and (3) on the name of the E-K branch, the name of the E-K branch; and (4) on the name of the E-K branch; and (3) on the name of the E-K branch; and (1) on the name of the E-K branch.

B. On August 30, 2013, the foregoing investigation document was presented to the Appellate Division of the Daegu District Court as evidence for the claim for loans, and was exercised by an employee who may have knowledge of the fact that the forged loan certificate was duly established.

(c)

Attempted Fraud