logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2020.02.14 2019고단2083
산업안전보건법위반
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of four months, and by a fine of three million won for a limited liability company of Defendant B.

However, the defendant A.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B A limited liability company is a business owner who is engaged in the business of manufacturing other tin products in the Seoul Special Self-Governing Zone, and Defendant A is a representative director of Defendant B limited liability company and a person in charge of safety and health management who is obligated to take safety and health measures for the prevention of industrial accidents of employees

1. Violation of the Occupational Safety and Health Act following D death of disaster workers;

A. As a result of Defendant A’s failure to take the following safety measures at the above workplace on March 23, 2019, the Defendant: (a) as a result of an employee D (the age of 66)’s rhythm of the rhym of the rhym of the rhym of the rhym of the rhm of the rhym of the rhym of the rhym of the rhym of the rhym of the rhym of the rhym of the rhym of the rhym of the rhym of the rhym of the rhym of the rhym of the rym of the rhym of the r

(1) In the event of loading, unloading, transporting, machinery, and handling of heavy objects on the vehicle system to prevent workers’ danger, the business owner shall prepare a work plan, including safety measures to prevent the fall, falling, electric shock, narrowing, and collapse risk, and have the work performed in accordance with that plan.

Nevertheless, although the defendant allowed the above D to perform processing work using heavy weight (building stones) of 6.5 to 7.2 tons of vehicles, the defendant did not prepare a work plan including safety measures to prevent narrowness, etc.

(2) No business owner shall allow any machinery, etc. to be used for any purpose other than that at the time of manufacture.

Nevertheless, the defendant used the above D without using cateror or other cateror when performing the work of maintaining the horizontality of stone for natural stone processing.

arrow