The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is a person engaging in driving a B car rental car.

On November 6, 2016, the Defendant driven the above car at around 21:30, and turned to the left at a speed below the speed of time in order to enter a modern apartment complex while driving the road of the two-lanes in front of the modern apartment complex, which is 655, in Daejeon Dong-dong, along the direction of 4-dong, the two-lanes in front of the modern apartment, which is 655, in the direction of 4-dong, in the direction of 4-dong.

At all times, there was a road without a left turn signal, and in the opposite direction of the defendant, the victim C(22) driving D car is driving in the direction of 4 U.S. driving in the direction of 4 U.S., so in such a case, there was a duty of care to live well before and after the driver, maintain the safety distance with other automobiles, and turn to the left.

그럼에도 불구하고 피고인은 이를 게을리 한 채 좌회전 한 과실로 피해자 C 승용차의 앞부분을 피고 인의 카 렌스 승용차 앞부분으로 들이받고, 그 충격으로 피해자의 승용차가 튕겨 나가 현대아파트 단지 입구에서 정차 중이 던 E 운전의 F 승용차를 들이받게 하고, 피고 인의 카 렌스 승용차가 튕겨 나가 인도 편에 있는 농협은행 365 자동 코너 건물을 들이받게 하였다.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim C, such as knenee bones, which requires approximately six weeks of medical care due to such occupational negligence.

2. Determination

A. A. The crime of non-violation of intention: Article 3 (2) (b) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents. After the indictment of this case, the injured person submitted a written agreement to the effect that he/she does not wish to punish the accused or withdraws his/her wishing to punish the accused.

Judgment of dismissal of public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.