Text
1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 47,108,300 for the Plaintiff and KRW 6% per annum from November 14, 2017 to April 3, 2018.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The defendant is a person engaged in automobile automobile maintenance business, and D is a person engaged in automobile parts sales business under the trade name of "C", and the plaintiff is a corporation that manufactures and sells automobile parts.
B. Around October 31, 2017, D had KRW 47,108,30,00 for the amount of goods not repaid to the Defendant.
(hereinafter “instant claim”). C.
Meanwhile, while the Plaintiff had a separate claim amounting to KRW 62,160,235 against D, D was unable to repay its debt, and on November 10, 2017, D decided to acquire the instant claim against D against the Defendant.
The Plaintiff notified the Defendant by means of content-certified mail of November 10, 2017 of the acquisition of the instant claim, which reaches the Defendant on November 13, 201.
[Ground of recognition] 1 to 4 evidence Nos. 1 to 4 (including paper numbers), witness D's testimony, purpose of the whole pleading
2. According to the above facts of determination, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff who acquired the instant claim 47,108,300 won of the instant claim and 15% of the annual interest rate prescribed by the Commercial Act from November 14, 2017 to April 3, 2018, the delivery date of a copy of the instant complaint from November 14, 2017, which is the date following the arrival date of the notice of the above acquisition of the instant claim, and 3% of the annual interest rate prescribed by the main sentence of Article 3(1) of the Addenda of the Act on Special Cases Concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings (Presidential Decree No. 29768, May 21, 2019) (Presidential Decree No. 29768, May 21, 2019) to the Plaintiff at the rate of 15% of the annual interest rate prescribed by the former Special Cases Concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings from June 1, 2019 to the date of full payment.
Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.