All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. On the grounds stated in its reasoning, the lower court issued an order to disclose and notify personal information to the Defendant and the person subject to the request to attach an attachment order (hereinafter “Defendant”) for five years, on the ground that the Defendant and the person subject to the request to attach an attachment order (hereinafter “Defendant”) were not subject to any special circumstance

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on mental and physical disability, disclosure order

According to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten years is imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing

In this case where a more minor sentence is imposed on the defendant, the argument that the punishment is too unreasonable is not a legitimate ground for appeal.

2. Examining the reasoning of the judgment below regarding the request for attachment order in light of the records, it is just that the court below ordered the defendant to attach an electronic tracking device for seven years, considering the risk of recidivism, on the grounds as stated in its reasoning, and there is no violation of law as otherwise

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.