A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and by a fine of thirty million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Punishment of the crime

[2017 Highest 2892]

1. On December 14, 2017, the Defendant, in violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) driving, on the following occasions: (a) around 15:45 on December 14, 2017: (b) around 2 km section from the mutual influence restaurant located in the outer dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong

2. The Defendant interfered with the business of the victim’s restaurant business by force, such as: (a) entering and leaving the victim’s D to the extent that the victim’s D is inside and outside of the operation thereof; and (b) allowing the customers in the said place to leave the restaurant; (c) thereby obstructing the victim’s restaurant business.

3. Violence;

A. The Defendant committed a crime against the victim D at around 15:45 on the same day as paragraph 1, set forth a claim against the victim D (at around 68 years of age) on the route of the victim D (at least 15:45 years of age) to enter a restaurant and enter the restaurant.

“Alongly sound and assaulted on the left side of the victim’s right at one time.”

B. The Defendant, at around 17:00 on the same day as Paragraph 1, committed the crime against the victim E, sought again to the above C, and assaulted the victim over the floor by generating the victim’s right edge part of the victim who was seated in the victim E (52 years) at his/her seat on the ground that he/she saws the victim E (52 years).

[2018 Highest 774]

1. On March 30, 2018, the Defendant driven a cT100 occ under the influence of alcohol leveling 0.065% of alcohol level in approximately 200 meters from the 200-meter section before the cT100 occ under the influence of alcohol leveling 0.065%, without obtaining a motor device license, on the front of the road in front of the 21:30 Moccin-si, the mutual influored soft road.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act is a person who has an objection to registered CT100.

The defendant was driving the above otoba, which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the same time and place as the preceding paragraph.