logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원서산지원 2017.07.04 2017가단2085
건물인도 등
Text

1. The defendant is against the plaintiffs:

(a) Of the buildings listed in the separate sheet, the Annex A, 2, 3, 4 and 1, respectively.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiffs and the Defendant’s assertion of the claim are as follows: June 10, 2016.

A lease contract with a deposit of KRW 30 million, monthly rent of KRW 1.7 million, value-added tax of KRW 170,000, and management fee of the commercial buildings on the port was concluded, and the rent was agreed to pay KRW 130,000 on the 10th of each month.

Since September 10, 2016, the defendant did not pay the rent of the commercial building at all.

Accordingly, the Plaintiffs on January 23, 2017, and the same year

2. 23. On two occasions, the Defendant notified that the lease contract will be terminated unless the unpaid amount is paid within seven days from the date of receipt of the notice. However, the Defendant did not pay the unpaid amount.

Therefore, since the above lease contract was terminated, the defendant is obligated to deliver the above commercial building to the plaintiffs and return the amount of unjust enrichment equivalent to the unpaid rent or rent.

2. Articles 208(3)1 and 257 of the Civil Procedure Act: A judgment without holding any pleadings;

arrow