1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 14, 1966, the Plaintiff entered the Army and participated in the Vietnam War from August 18, 1967 to August 31, 1968; from March 15, 1969 to April 25, 1970; and discharged on May 30, 1970; and on May 30, 2012, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of a patient suffering from defoliants under the name of the disease; on October 24, 2012, the Plaintiff was recognized as having been determined as having failed to meet the standards for disability ratings in the injury and disease. However, upon recognition of disability ratings in the above injury and disease, the Plaintiff was determined as having satisfied the standards for disability ratings.

B. On November 28, 2012, the Plaintiff filed an application for a re-examination with respect to “mathosis” and “surinology”, and filed an application for a re-examination with respect to “urinology” and “high blood pressure.” However, on July 2, 2013, the Plaintiff received notification of the determination on the non-conformity of defoliants with respect to “Macinology” and “Macinology” and the notification of the determination on “Macinosis” and “high blood pressure” on July 15, 2013.

Accordingly, the Plaintiff filed a re-verification physical examination for “high blood pressure” on June 7, 2013, and registered as a patient suffering from potential aftereffects of defoliants upon the determination of GyeongVO (a medical specialist L), according to the outcome of the physical examination at the veterans hospital, and according to the opinion of closing the Rabrodide in the coordinates. (c) On March 17, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application for a re-verification physical examination for “urine disease” on the veterans hospital on April 7, 2014, and received the physical examination at the veterans hospital on April 7, 2014, and the Defendant was determined to fall short of the standards for rating on July 23, 2014 by the medical specialist at the national hospital, and notified the Plaintiff of the results of the re-verification physical examination for classification of actual aftereffects of defoliants’s injury rating (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2 (including paper numbers, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 6, 8, 10 to 20), the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion is a clurology of urology.