1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) On April 9, 2012, at the time of stay from the Defendant, the Plaintiff is entitled to the seminars of the D Building and the term “snatisfy” (hereinafter “satfynaf”).

2) Of the instant construction works, the interior construction works of the 3th indoor story (hereinafter referred to as the “instant construction works”).

(2) The Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the remainder of the construction cost 287,543,000 won, excluding the Plaintiff’s paid 238,000,000 won. (2) Even if the Plaintiff received a subcontract from the Defendant, not the Plaintiff directly contracted the instant construction work, but the Defendant was obligated to pay the Plaintiff the full payment of the instant construction cost, and thus, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the remainder of the construction cost, excluding the Plaintiff’s paid 238,00,000,000 won.

B. The Defendant’s assertion is merely giving a contract to E with all of the instant construction works, including the instant construction works, and there was no fact that the instant construction works were awarded to the Plaintiff, and there was no agreement that the Defendant would pay the Plaintiff the entire construction cost.

However, the defendant prepared a contract document formally at the plaintiff's request that the injured plaintiff's worker be eligible for industrial accident compensation insurance (hereinafter "industrial accident insurance") and only paid part of the contract price to E was directly paid to the plaintiff.

2. Determination

A. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in evidence No. 2, evidence No. 2, evidence No. 4-1, 2, and evidence No. 7, the Defendant’s construction cost of KRW 18,00,000 and construction period of the instant construction work from April 9, 2012 to the Plaintiff.