logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.11.22 2017고단3761 (1)
사기등
Text

Defendant

A For each crime set forth in sub-paragraph A of 2017 Highest 3761, 2017 Highest 5274, 2017 Highest 5401, two years and six months of imprisonment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 30, 2016, Defendant A and Defendant B (criminal records) were sentenced to imprisonment for 10 months and 2 years of suspended execution on September 7, 2016, with labor for violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint conflict) at the Seoul Central District Court Act (hereinafter “Seoul Central District Court”), and the above judgment became final and conclusive on August 30, 2016.

[Criminal facts]

1. The Defendants’ role sharing, his name in a public invitation relationship, and D are those in charge of providing an account for remittance of the amount of damage acquired through the “Sscaming” through Defendant A to commit telecommunications fraud using the so-called “Scaming” method, and collecting and transmitting the amount of damage received through the Defendant Company A to instruct the withdrawal and delivery of cash, and Defendant B, F, etc. are those in charge of additionally soliciting the aforementioned withdrawals and delivering them to Defendant A or D, or directly withdrawing and delivering the amount of damage.

Defendant

A From May 2015 to July 7, 2015, between F, would provide F with an account to receive the remittance of the amount of the amount of the singishing damage, and withdraw and deliver the money from the account to the account, the amount of KRW 1.5 million to KRW 2 million.

“A proposal was made to the purport that “F”, and the consent was made by G and H with the same purport as Defendant A, and the consent was given by G and H, F and G, and H were in charge of withdrawing and delivering the amount of damage incurred from “ Bosing,” and around that time, Defendant B was in charge of receiving and delivering the amount of damage incurred from the F’s account from F.

As such, the Defendants conspired to commit telecommunications financing fraud in order to play their respective roles together with name-free boxes, D, F, etc.

2. Joint crimes committed by the Defendants

A. On June 18, 2015, Defendant A committed the crime of telecommunication finance fraud, obtained the name account number, cell phone number from F and transmitted it to the name in order to prepare an account to be used for committing telecommunications finance fraud.

arrow