logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.09.15 2016고단5423
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2016 Highest 5423"

1. On December 20, 1995, the criminal defendant against the victim D did not have money necessary for the marriage of her children” to the victim in the victim's residence located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Northern District E around December 20, 1995.

The repayment will be made three months after the loan of KRW 10 million.

After the end of “Woo”, a promissory note causing 10 million won in face value was issued to the victim.

However, the defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay money even if he borrowed money from the damaged party because he borrowed money from the neighboring party because the principal is not well recovered at the time of the time, and the defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay it.

As above, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and obtained the delivery of KRW 10 million from the victim, i.e., from the victim, for the loan.

2. Fraud against victim F;

A. On July 5, 1995, the Defendant used and repaid only one month by lending KRW 10 million to the victim at the victim’s residence located in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government apartment G apartment 108 Dong 404, around July 5, 1995.

“.......”

However, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay, even if he/she borrowed money from the damaged person due to the circumstances such as the above “1”.

As above, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and obtained the delivery of KRW 10 million from the victim, i.e., from the victim, for the loan.

B. On July 10, 1995, the Defendant: (a) around July 10, 1995, the victim gets a house from the victim’s residence.

It is possible to lend KRW 20 million to repay without a mold.

“Broning up to KRW 10 million” and “Broning up to KRW 10 million.”

“A Promissory Notes were issued to the victim at par value 30 million won.”

However, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay, even if he/she borrowed money from the damaged person due to the circumstances such as the above “1”.

The defendant is the victim as above.

arrow