logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원천안지원 2017.11.22 2015가단5589
집행문부여
Text

1. As to the decision of the Daejeon District Court B indirect compulsory performance case between the plaintiff and the defendant, paragraph 2 of this Article.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company that produces automobile parts, etc. and supplies them to complete companies, such as modern automobiles, and the Defendant is a subdivision of the Plaintiff Company’s Agsan Factory belonging to the Chungcheong Branch of the Korean Metal Trade Union, an industrial trade union under the Korean Democratic Trade Union Federation.

B. The Plaintiff filed a provisional disposition prohibiting interference with business with the Defendant in 2013. The court accepted part of the Plaintiff’s application and rendered a decision on December 26, 2013 that “the Defendant shall not commit any act that causes noise exceeding 70dB, or cause a third party to do so, by using the door door of the factory except for the union room and playground in the factory listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter “instant factory”). The Defendant is at the site of production of workers, and at the welfare Dong, insult, defamation, assault, intimidation, intimidation, microphone, amper, ample, ample, etc. against the Plaintiff’s officers and employees.”

(The Daejeon District Court's Branch Decision 2013Kahap48, hereinafter referred to as "the provisional disposition of this case")

On December 30, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application for indirect compulsory enforcement based on the instant provisional disposition order, and on December 30, 2014, the court rendered a decision of indirect compulsory enforcement as follows.

(B) Daejeon District Court Branch B, and hereinafter “instant order of indirect compulsory enforcement”). The instant order of indirect compulsory enforcement was served on January 5, 2015, and the Defendant’s appeal was dismissed and became final and conclusive thereafter.

The following:

1. The defendant shall not commit any act of causing noise exceeding 70dB by using a factory door, the main place of management building room and playground, the street room of the main place of management, the workers' production site, the insult of the plaintiff's officers and employees, defamation, defamation, assault, intimidation, and microphone, loudspeaker, amper, amper, ample, ample, etc., except in the factory of this case, or allow a third party to do so.

2. The defendant was notified of this decision.

arrow