beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of eight months.
However, as to Defendant B, this shall not apply.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendants of “2013 Highest 317” are those who lived with women under the agreement from September 21, 2004 to May 2013, 2013, and the victim F and the victim E (former name G) were those who were the single customers at H “I” located in the first week, the Defendant B’s workplace.
1. The Defendants conspired to obtain money, goods, etc. from the victim as if B would be married with the victim, using the fact that the victim E, who was the son of the said “I,” the main son of the said “I, would be able to obtain money, goods, etc. from the victim as if B would be married with the victim.
As a result, the Defendants were able to drink with the victim at the main point of the HJ located in the first and second state of August 2009, the first instance court held that the Defendant “B would not have a house if you live together with the victim,” and Defendant A would have to go against the victim’s genuine desire to marry with the victim, such as “B would not have a house if you live together with B, and 30 million won if you want to die with the victim. In addition, there is a difference of KRW 8 million when you die with the new marriage. In addition, there is a difference of 100,000 to go through marriage. At least 10, the Defendant B would be able to live together with the victim, and Defendant A would have a genuine wish to marry with the victim.”
However, in fact, Defendant B did not intend to live together with the victim, and the Defendants thought to use the money received from the victim as director fund and hospital expenses, etc., and even if having received the above marriage fund and the plaque from the victim, there was no intention or ability to seek a deposit on the premise of marriage between Defendant B and the victim, or to purchase home appliances, etc.
Nevertheless, the Defendants received KRW 15 million from the victims to the Agricultural Cooperative (K) account under Defendant B’s name on the 10th of the same month for the purchase of a new marries, and two gold bars and one gold ball as the 11th of the same month for the 10th of the same month.