The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The lower court’s sentence (six months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, 80 hours of community service, and 40 hours of lectures to comply) on the gist of the grounds of appeal is deemed unreasonable because it is too unfasible.

2. The fact that the judgment defendant again committed the instant crime despite the fact that he/she had been punished several times for the same kind of crime is disadvantageous.

On the other hand, the fact that the defendant recognizes and reflects his mistake is favorable.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, family relationship, and motive for committing the crime, various sentencing conditions as shown in the instant records and arguments, the lower court’s punishment is too uneasible and unreasonable. Therefore, the Prosecutor’s assertion is without merit.

3. The appeal by the prosecutor of the conclusion is without merit and is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.