Text
1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 75,000,000 with respect to the Plaintiff and Defendant Taesan Comprehensive Construction Co., Ltd. on January 2016.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On February 6, 2014, the Plaintiff: (a) around February 6, 2014, the scheduled date for commencement of construction works for machinery and equipment among the construction works for the construction works for the main complex located A (hereinafter “instant main complex building”) located in the Gu-U.S. Si, Gu-si; (b) around February 10, 2014; (c) the scheduled date for completion of construction works; (d) March 31, 2014; (e) the construction contract amount shall be KRW 117,00,000 (excluding value-added tax); and (e) the construction contract amount shall be determined as KRW 17,00,000 (excluding value-added tax); and (e)
B. During the above construction process, the Plaintiff performed additional construction work equivalent to KRW 8,000,000 for the construction cost at the request of the Defendant Daesan, and completed the said installation work.
C. On August 25, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into an agreement with the Defendant Jongsan Co., Ltd., the owner of the construction project for the construction of the instant main complex building (hereinafter “Defendant U.S.”), and with the Defendant U.S., the owner of the construction project for the instant main complex building: (a) to determine that the construction cost the Plaintiff did not pay to the Plaintiff by the time; (b) to the Plaintiff was KRW 75,00,000; and (c) to the Plaintiff that the Defendant U.S., the principal contractor, upon the completion of the construction project, agreed to pay the construction cost directly to the Plaintiff; and (c) to ensure that the Defendant U.S.
(hereinafter “instant direct payment agreement”) D.
On September 30, 2014, the registration of ownership transfer was completed with respect to the instant main complex building under the name of the Defendant U.S., and the Defendant U.S. was provided as collateral for the instant main complex building on the same day, and borrowed money from the U.S. Saemaul Bank.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Determination
A. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, the defendants jointly do the above construction cost of KRW 75,000,000 and the payment date for the said construction cost pursuant to the direct payment agreement in this case.