1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. Family relationship 1) Family relationship 1) E is F as the south of E, and F was married with G and had H, I, J, K, Plaintiff A, Plaintiff B, and L as their children. 2) The J married with Defendant C, and had M, Defendant D, N, andO as their children.

3) E: (a) on April 5, 1945; (b) on October 17, 1975; and (c) on February 20, 207, the J died respectively; (b) on each real estate listed in [Attachment 1] Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4 (hereinafter “paragraph 1 real estate”) of the [Attachment 1] list, the transfer registration for ownership was completed in E’s name; (c) on each real estate listed in [Attachment 5] and (d), the transfer registration for ownership was completed due to sale in F’s name.

2) As to the real estate of 1, 2, 3, and 6 January 14, 1980, J under the former Act on Special Measures for the Registration, etc. of Ownership of Real Estate (Act No. 3094, Dec. 31, 1977; hereinafter "the former Act on Special Measures for the Registration, etc. of Ownership of Real Estate") on January 10, 1971

The registration of ownership transfer was completed in accordance with the Act on Special Measures (No. 3094) on April 28, 1980, and the registration of ownership transfer was completed in accordance with the Act on Special Measures (No. 4502, Nov. 30, 1992), and the registration of ownership transfer was completed in accordance with the Act on Special Measures (No. 4502, Nov. 30, 1992) on August 2, 1993 on December 5, 1993. 3) following the death of JJ, the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of the defendant C on July 27, 2007, and the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of the defendant C on paragraph 6 on the real estate under the name of the defendant C on July 27, 2007, and in the name of the defendant D on the real estate under paragraph

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4 (including branch numbers, if any) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff’s assertion is based on the name of the Defendants, such as the transfer of ownership in the name of J and the transfer of ownership under the Act on Special Measures, since the Plaintiff was issued a false certificate of guarantee even though the Plaintiff did not purchase or receive a donation of each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet from F.