1. The Defendant indicated in the attached Form No. 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, among the land size B 1,325 square meters of Daegu-gun road B 1,325 square meters to the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On November 10, 1968, the Plaintiff purchased and resided in the Daegu-gun, Daegu-gun, 9m2 (hereinafter “instant land”), D, 215m2 (hereinafter “D”) in Daegu-gun, Daegu-gun (hereinafter “Seoul”) and on the instant D’s land, b4.1m2 and 13.8m2 of the instant land on a single-story 24.1m2 of the instant land and a single-story 13.8m2 of the instant land (hereinafter “instant housing”). On September 19, 1983, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer on each of the instant land on September 10, 1983, and completed the registration of ownership preservation on each of the instant land on October 14, 1983.

B. On February 27, 1976, the road B 1,325 square meters (hereinafter “instant road”) in Daegu-gun, Daegu-gun, was owned by the Defendant and registered as administrative property on the ledger of the State property. The Defendant did not designate the instant road as “road” or have decided to use it for public purposes by administrative disposition under the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes, such as the Road Act. Since the Plaintiff purchased each of the instant land and the instant housing as indicated in the foregoing paragraph, as indicated in the foregoing paragraph, the part 1 square meters in the instant road connected with each of the instant items in sequence of 1,2,3,4,4,5,6,7,7,8,9,10,100 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”). The land for the instant housing site (hereinafter “instant land”) located within the fence of the instant housing and its outer part of the instant land, and is being used as the site for the instant housing site (hereinafter “the instant land and the outer marina line”) and the previous part of the instant land.

C. On the other hand, the Plaintiff was ordered to give prior notice of the imposition of indemnity and voluntary removal of unauthorized occupancy facilities on the ground that the Plaintiff occupied the land in the dispute of this case owned by the Defendant without permission from the Military Service around June 2012.