beta
Text
All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.
Reasons
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. The sentence of the lower court (14 years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.
2. We also examine the Defendant and the prosecutor’s allegation of unreasonable sentencing.
The Defendant is a primary offender with no particular criminal power, and the Defendant’s mistake is against his depth while making a confession of all of the instant crimes, and deposited a total of KRW 30,000,000 for AK, which is a victim’s child, and the Defendant filed a lawsuit against the Defendant seeking damages for tort. On February 11, 2014, the Seoul Southern District Court Decision 2013Gahap14720 decided that “The Defendant paid to AJ 135,098, 340 won, and 140,098, 430 won, and 20% interest per annum to AK from October 24, 2013 to the day of full payment” was pronounced in this court.
The crime of this case is a normal situation that is favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant and the victim are in a fluenent relationship, and that the defendant would have been fluent by the defendant, who has been fluenent in the process of fluenting the countermeasures against pregnancy. The defendant, who has been employed for more than 14 years as a police officer, has been engaged in a relatively exemplary public office life, such as receiving a certificate of commendation, etc., and that there are two children, including the wife of the defendant, and that the fluent relationship including the defendant's wife, or the fluent relationship between the workplace and the worker wanting to be flu
On the other hand, on the other hand, human life is more severe than anything else, so murder cannot be justified for any reason.
However, the crime of this case is committed by the defendant, after he murdered the victim's neck who had been in an internal relationship with his hand for about 10 minutes, the crime of this case is committed to the chief of the passenger car of the defendant.