logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2013.04.19 2012노3909
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

Reasons

1. In light of the circumstances at the time of the instant traffic accident, the intent of the Defendant to escape from the scene of the accident is recognized without taking necessary measures, such as aiding the victim.

2. The facts charged and the judgment of the court below

A. The gist of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a person engaging in driving a C-business taxi.

around 17:50 on March 26, 2012, the Defendant driven the above taxi and went through a road of only one-way driving in the direction of the Busan-do Busan-dong, by moving from the front side of the department store to the mouth of the same door, and neglecting the duty of safety driving, and thus neglecting the duty of safety driving, the Defendant left the way from the right side of the Defendant’s vehicle to the left side by turning the back from the front side of the victim D such as the outbreak, etc. to the right side of the victim, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as aiding the victim’s injury, such as cutting down in the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the body of the victim, which requires five weeks medical treatment, and even taking necessary measures, such as aiding the victim.

B. The lower court determined that: (a) the Defendant’s vehicle used to 150 meters of the taxi again, while the victim, who gets out of the back wheel of the vehicle, putting the vehicle into the back wheel by the Defendant, putting the vehicle in the shape of the victim, and without properly verifying the status of the victim; (b) the Defendant’s taxi attached to the Defendant’s taxi parked in the front section because the victim gets out of the vehicle, driving away from the scene of the accident; and (c) the Defendant did not properly disclose the Defendant’s seat while leaving the scene of the accident, and did not keep contact details.

However, in the situation that the victim was dead to get off passengers, the defendant did not clearly understand the fact of the accident, and the defendant did not properly listen to the talk that the victim was injured due to the rapid decline in the surroundings, the destination remains long, and the site of the accident does not turn up the vehicle in a narrow one-way way.

arrow