logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.06.10 2016고정123
절도
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. On September 4, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 16:00 on September 4, 2015, the Defendant: (b) placed, in plastic plastic bags, probrupted and stolen probial items, such as clothes, brushes, and brushes, the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 100,000,00, while cleaning after being asked to request the damaged party to clean the room from the view of the Defendant’s office located in the front west-gun C.

2. The facts charged in this part of the judgment are an offense falling under Article 329 of the Criminal Act and committing the above offense among relatives not living together pursuant to Articles 354 and 328 of the Criminal Act, a public prosecution may be instituted only when a criminal complaint is filed.

However, according to the records of this case, the defendant's appearance, as a victim's mother, is the relative relationship between the victim and the relative relationship within the fourth degree of relationship under Articles 767 and 777 of the Civil Act; the defendant and the victim did not live together; and the defendant and the victim received a written withdrawal of the complaint to the effect that the victim revoked the complaint against the defendant after the prosecution of this case.

Therefore, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow