A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 16:52 on January 10, 2019, the Defendant: (a) expressed the victim’s desire to see that the victim would return to the road; (b) “the victim would have to wear the thrings,” and “the victim would have to wear the strings,” on the ground that the victim would have returned to the road; (c) 16:52 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc., of Specific Crimes, etc., (the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc., of Specific Crimes, etc., (the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc., of Specific Crimes, etc., of Specific Crimes (the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc., of Specific Crimes, etc., was committed by the victim at one time with his/her left hand; and (d) 2) considered the victim’s s

As a result, the defendant assaulted the victim who is the driver of a vehicle in operation, and suffered from the victim such as grhuming and grheging around the snow for about two weeks in need of treatment.

2. The Defendant damaged the property by putting the brush worn by the victim C with the left hand at the time, place, and left hand as set forth in the above Paragraph 1, and 200,000 won of the market price owned by the victim, by putting the hand of the victim to be returned and putting the brush.

3. On January 10, 2019, the Defendant: (a) expressed that he spits the floor of the wooden Police Station Emba in F on January 16, 2019; and (b) expressed that he spits it on the floor to G during the process of identifying the circumstances of the instant police box, upon receiving a report by the said C, who was reported as a taxi engineer; and (c) stated that he spits it on the floor; (d) “grheat, spite,” and “a dogf who would be well flabed,” and assaulted at one time by taking the part of the above G’s table to restrain it on his hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning investigation of reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning G and C;

1. A written diagnosis and written estimate for warning;

1. Photographs;

1. Application of the CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the CDs and CCTVs related to black stuffs and e-stations;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;