All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for two years, etc.; imprisonment with prison labor for one year and eight months, etc.) of the lower court is too unreasonable;

2. The lower court determined the Defendants’ punishment by taking into account the favorable and unfavorable circumstances to the Defendants, as seen above.

In full view of all the circumstances that are conditions for sentencing in this court, the judgment of the court below was judged to have exceeded the reasonable scope of its discretion, or there is no special change in circumstances that may change the original court’s punishment.

In addition, the sentencing of the lower court does not seem to have exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion by comprehensively taking into account the factors revealed in the proceedings of the instant case, such as the Defendants’ age, environment, background and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime.

The Defendants’ assertion of unreasonable sentencing is without merit.

3. The Defendants’ appeal is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.