Text
1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
. Not recognized.
Accordingly, I shall be judged aside from the grade.
On March 4, 2017: On March 4, 2017, the date of receipt of the written request for the decision of this case: On March 4, 2017, the date of the first diagnosis on the left side 3 balance : On March 4, 2017: The reason for the decision grade (no corresponding to the disability): the degree of disability at the time of the completion of treatment ( March 6, 2017), including the medical record area, shall be examined as a result of the examination of the data submitted, such as the medical record area, etc., "the date of injury, the date of occurrence, and the first diagnosis: June 24, 199)" and "the third, five balance tensions on the left side (the date of injury, the date of outbreak and the first diagnosis: July 15, 199): The left loss cannot be used for the remaining disability grade, but the remaining disability grade shall not be affected by the previous disability grade 4.
* On March 4, 2017, the left hand is verified to be lost to be lost to the left hand on the radiation photograph. However, on the medical record in 1999 and 2017, the record on the winning of the finger is not confirmed, and on July 15, 1999, the left hand is not verified. Fifth, on the record on the record on the pressure of the finger, the left hand hand can not be confirmed to be the cause of the finger, the occurrence of the finger, and the accurate first day of the finger.
Accordingly, I shall be judged aside from the grade.
[Grounds for recognition] The facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1-5, Eul evidence Nos. 1-1-3, Eul evidence Nos. 1-3, and the plaintiff's error in judgment on disability ratings asserted by the whole purport of the pleadings (the second and third rulings of this case) were injured to the left hand over three times, and the defendant did not recognize one of the plaintiff's left hand 4 knifies cut off (hereinafter "the disability of this case") on or around July 15, 199.
However, the plaintiff works as presses on the corresponding date.