logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.11.24 2016고단3528
상해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 12, 2016, at around 00:50, the Defendant: (a) received a report from the Defendant on the 119th day in front of the “Enodes Bank” located in Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu, on the ground that the victim F (34 years old) who is a fire official belonging to the Seo-gu fire fighting division in Gwangju-gu, sent out after having reported that the Defendant got out of the front side of the trees, caused the Defendant to kid the Defendant’s hand while carrying the Defendant on a first-aid vehicle, and caused the victim to suffer injury, such as the head and face part of the victim, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with emergency medical services by assaulting the victim who caused the fire brigade, and at the same time inflicted injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made by the police officer on F;

1. Written statements of G, H, I, and J;

1. Emergency medical service log and order for mobilization;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act for a crime and subparagraph 1 (c) of Article 50 of the Framework Act on Fire Services (a point of interference with emergency medical services) of the same Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (Punishment on which the punishment is heavier than that of an injury);

1. Selection of a sentence of selective fine (the case where a victim who is a fire brigade performing emergency medical services commits an injury by assaulting a victim who is a fire brigade and causing an injury shall not be light; however, the circumstance may be taken into consideration as the defendant's loss caused by the first-aid vehicle, resulting in an contingent crime by cutting his/her hand into the vehicle and causing him/her to commit an accident, such as the fact that the degree of obstruction of performance of official duties and injury is not severe, and that the victim does not want the punishment against the defendant by mutual consent with the victim);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

arrow