logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.11.07 2018고단1950
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 25, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that, at a D restaurant located in Sungnam-gu, the Sinnam-si, the Gannam-si, the Defendant organized a total of KRW 26 Guideide, KRW 800,000 per unit, KRW 200,000 per unit, and KRW 20,000 per unit, and KRW 20,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. The Defendant made a false statement to the effect that he/she would make a payment if he/she makes a normal payment to the victim E.

However, from around 2010, the Defendant was in a situation where some of the members of the fraternity were unable to pay the fraternity to the members of the fraternity because they were not paid the fraternity, was used to pay the fraternity to the members of the other fraternity. Since the Defendant was in a state of receiving the loan from the lending company, there was no intent or ability to pay the fraternity even if receiving the fraternity payment from the damaged party.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 10 million from February 25, 2013 to February 25, 2015 from the victim, and received KRW 3.6 million from the victims, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table from June 30, 2018.

2. Fraud of a loan;

A. On March 19, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant, at H operated by the Defendant in the Ma-gu, Ma-gu, Ma-dong, Ma-dong, Ma-dong, Ma-dong, the Defendant borrowed money to the victim F to extend and repair the beauty room.”

However, in fact, since the Defendant was unable to pay the money from the guidance operated by the Defendant at the time, it was thought that he received money from the injured party to use it for the payment of the money from another guidance operated by the Defendant, and there was no idea to use it for the extension repair of the beauty art room. Since the Defendant was unable to repay the money from the lender after receiving the loan from the lender, and thus, the intent or ability to repay it even if he borrowed money from the injured party

arrow