logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.07.13 2016가합103478
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) pays KRW 63,489,338 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

2. The remainder of the plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant).

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed to be combined.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company that engages in manufacturing, wholesale, retailing, etc. of clothes and subsidiary materials, and the Defendant is a company that engages in the business of manufacturing, selling, etc. of direct logistics.

B. The Plaintiff planned to sell clothing created by the Plaintiff through the home shopping broadcasts, and around 2015, our Home shopping Co., Ltd. (mutual name “slick Home shopping”; hereinafter “slick Home shopping”).

(2) Around July 2015, the Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed that the Plaintiff will deliver the originals necessary for the Plaintiff to manufacture a man-use winter box to be supplied to the home shopping, and the Defendant sent the Plaintiff a seal stamp on July 6, 2015 (11,800 US dollars) and the unit price (9,440 US$) to the Plaintiff. The Defendant finally agreed that the Defendant supplied the Plaintiff KRW 11,49.5 US (5,748 Won color color, 5,751,515 US color) (105,751) to the Plaintiff. However, on July 6, 2015, the contract amount of KRW 11,49,500 (11,80 US dollars) and the unit price (9,440 US dollars) were 11,49.5 US size to the Plaintiff.

3) In accordance with the instant contract, the Defendant’s “each of the instant sub-councils” consisting of the 5,748 Habman’s color in August 2015 and 5,751.5 Habman’s color in black (hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant sub-councils”).

(C) The Plaintiff supplied the raw materials of this case to the manufacturing factory located in Vietnam on August 20, 2015, and the Plaintiff supplied them to the manufacturing plant that entered into a contract with the Plaintiff.

arrow