1. The plaintiff's conjunctive claim is dismissed among the lawsuits against the defendant Spanco Construction Co., Ltd.

2. Defendant.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiff is the party’s position 1) The Plaintiff is the Plaintiff’s apartment and officetel with 123-dong, Busan Metropolitan City Shipping Daegu Do, 123-dong, 3 Lone Star apartment, 848-dong, 3-dong, 848-dong (=629-household officetels 219 households; hereinafter collectively referred to as the

2) In order to manage the apartment of this case, the Defendant Spanco Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Spanco Construction”) is a project proprietor who constructed and sold the apartment of this case, and Defendant Spanco Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Spanco Construction”) is a company that constructed the apartment of this case under contract with Defendant Spanco Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Spanco Construction”).

3) Defendant Seoul Guarantee Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Seoul Guarantee Insurance”).

(B) The instant apartment contract is a company that has entered into a warranty contract for the defects of the apartment. B. The Defendant Poco Construction Co., Ltd. to enter into a warranty contract for the defects of the instant apartment with the Defendant Seoul Guarantee Insurance and the instant apartment as indicated below (hereinafter “instant warranty contract”).

1) The guarantee creditor of each of the instant guarantee contracts was changed to Plaintiff: 100-00-200-208 208 2.208 - 196 - 290 - 1008 - 3108 - 205 - 208 - 108 - 204 - 108 - 205 - 2008 - 108 - 204 - 108 - 205 - 208 - 204 - 208 - 20 - 13 05 - 208 - 20 - 13 108 - 205 20 - 108 19, 2008 - 204 - 105 208 - 19, 2010