1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 46 million and the Plaintiff’s 5% per annum from June 18, 2013 to February 18, 2014; and (b).

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On July 11, 2008, the Defendant: (a) obtained from C the Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D Apartment 165 102 dong 102 (hereinafter “instant apartment”) from KRW 460,000 to KRW 460,000; and (b) concluded a lease agreement with C on August 17, 2012 with respect to the instant apartment by setting the lease agreement as the lease agreement between C and C during the period from October 6, 2012 to October 5, 2014.

B. On March 22, 2013, on the premise that the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with C with regard to the said apartment, the Plaintiff acquired the right to operate the instant childcare center and facilities from the Defendant, but at the time of the contract, KRW 5 million as the down payment, and the remainder of KRW 45 million as of May 20, 2013 (hereinafter “instant transfer agreement”) entered into a contract for the transfer of rights facilities (hereinafter “instant transfer agreement”), and paid KRW 5 million as the down payment to the Defendant on the date of the contract.

C. In addition, on March 25, 2013, the Plaintiff drafted a lease agreement on the said apartment with C, and according to the above lease agreement, the deposit amount of KRW 460 million is from March 25, 2013 to October 25, 2014; the deposit amount is to be paid from March 25, 2013 to October 25, 2014, and the deposit is to be paid both on March 25, 2013 without separately stipulating the down payment; the contract is to be changed to A (the Plaintiff) a new lessee (the Plaintiff), according to the circumstances of the lessee, and the lease is not to be applied two years, which is the provision of the Lease Protection Act, but to terminate the lease at the expiration of the lease period on October 25, 2014 by mutual agreement.

The term "the name and resident registration number of the defendant are stated in the next part." On the other hand, the plaintiff and the defendant enter into a lease contract with the present tenant at the present location of the lease contract, but they have been a lease contract with the present tenant at the present location of the lease contract, but they are under the name of the new tenant with the consent of the lessor due to the current lessee.