logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.10.28 2016고단2117
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 29, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for six months or one year of suspension of execution with labor for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Changwon District Court on November 29, 2012, and on July 8, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for ten months or two years of suspension of execution with labor for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Changwon District Court on July 8, 2015 and was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution on July 16, 2015.

On June 4, 2016, at around 23:35, the Defendant driven C salary-free vehicle under the influence of alcohol with approximately 100 meters alcohol concentration 0.205% while under the influence of alcohol without obtaining a driver’s license from the front day of the mutual influence, which is located in Kimhae-si, Kim Jong-si to the livestock cooperative in the same Dong.

"2016 Highest 2561"

1. On July 28, 2016, the Defendant driving a DPoter Ⅱ without obtaining a driver’s license in the section of about 1 km from the trade influoral influoral drinking road located in the Kim Jong-si, Kim Jong-si, to the 3rd-do road located in the same east 1km and front of the road.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Refusal of Drinking Measures) was demanded by the Defendant to respond to a drinking test by inserting approximately 32 minutes a drinking measuring instrument into a drinking measuring instrument, on the ground that there are reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant was driving under the influence of alcohol, such as smelling, smelling, snicking, and snicking, while driving the said cargo in front of the T-line and driving on the front of the said T-line at the same time, from an slopeF belonging to the Kimhae Police Station in the Kimhae-gu Police Station, while driving the said cargo.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not put the part of the drinking-free measuring instrument into the drinking-free measuring instrument, and the defendant did not comply with the police officer's request for a drinking-free measuring instrument without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

"2016 Highest 2117"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Notification of the results of the control of drinking driving, report on the state of drinking drivers' state statement, and inquiry into the results of the control of drinking driving;

1. The register of driver's licenses (A);

arrow