The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In relation to mistake of facts ① Indecent act by force against the victim C, the Defendant only was fuckbucks or bucks of the said victim, and there was no fact that the said victim’s her her her her her her her her her her her

② In relation to indecent act by compulsion against the victim F, the Defendant was only friendly on the victim’s bridge, etc. by entering the victim’s bridge, etc. two times, and did not commit an indecent act against the said victim as described in the facts charged.

③ In relation to indecent act by compulsion against the victim G, the Defendant does not have any physical contact with the victim.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (two months of imprisonment and four months of imprisonment, 40 hours of completing sexual assault treatment programs, 5 years of employment restriction) is too unreasonable.

2. Following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court regarding the assertion of mistake of facts: (i) the victim G and C in the same prison room around June 1, 2018: (ii) the victim G committed an indecent act as described in the pertinent facts charged; (iii) the victim G and the victim F, who moved to another ward, was also subject to indecent act as described in the facts charged; and (iv) the victim G and F, who was in another ward, did not appear to have gathered to make a false statement to the victim; and (v) the victim G and F, who was in a different ward, made a statement to the effect that they were involved in an indecent act as described in the facts charged; and (v) the victim G and F, who was in a different ward, were present in the investigative agency within the same scope as the victim G and F, and made a false statement.