logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.01.14 2015가합3713
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly share the Plaintiff KRW 244,754,350, and KRW 239,00,000 among them, from December 19, 2014.

Reasons

1. Presumed factual basis

A. Defendant C is a certified tax accountant operating a certified tax accountant office in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, and Defendant B is a head of the office of the above office.

B. On December 18, 2014, the Plaintiff found in Defendant C’s office and provided Defendant B with tax counseling.

Defendant B provided that “The Plaintiff shall bear KRW 284,00,000,000 for capital gains tax, but the Plaintiff shall be subject to reduction of KRW 234,00,000 as a fee for reduction of KRW 5,00,000 through the tax adjustment.”

On the same day, the Plaintiff transferred KRW 239,000,000 to Defendant B.

C. However, Defendant B did not pay all the Plaintiff’s transfer income tax with the money transferred as above.

Accordingly, the Plaintiff, at the latest, made a payment of capital gains tax on July 15, 2015. During that process, the Plaintiff paid additional 5,230,950 won, and additional 523,400 won, which were imposed by the Namyang-si, in addition to capital gains tax, were paid in addition to additional 5,230,950 won.

[Grounds for recognition] Gap 1 to 9 (including paper numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. In full view of the following circumstances: (a) Defendant B received all of the money in the name of capital gains tax and fees immediately from the Plaintiff on the ground that it would partially reduce or exempt taxes; (b) Defendant B did not perform the Plaintiff’s capital gains tax-related business for eight months after receiving KRW 239,00,000 from the Plaintiff as capital gains tax and fees; (c) Defendant B did not faithfully respond to the Plaintiff’s physical records related to tax treatment and avoided overseas travel, etc. from the Plaintiff through doping; and (d) comprehensively taking account of all circumstances such as the process of receiving money, the attitude after receiving money, and the process of performing delegated affairs, etc., including: (a) Defendant B acquired the said money by deceiving the Plaintiff without the intention to pay capital gains tax from the beginning; and (b) Defendant B did not pay capital gains tax; and (c) Defendant B did not pay capital gains tax.

arrow