1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

The reasons for this judgment of this court shall be the same as the judgment of the first instance.

(The main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act): Provided, That any addition or addition shall be made as follows:

1. “The jurisdiction shall be deleted” under the second and second bottom of the judgment of the first instance.

2. Subsequent to the fourth anniversary of the judgment of the first instance court, “Health Team” attached the following: “Even if the investigation of the status of F was not faithfully faithful, it is insufficient to readily conclude that it was an unlawful act in violation of the statute in light of the revealed circumstances.”

3.The following shall be added on the 5th day of the first instance judgment and the 7th day of the decision:

The plaintiff asserts that the staff in charge of Gdong office did not have been able to read the "one unit of the same number at the time of entering the transfer household of the instant house at the request of enforcement officer F, even though he did not have been able to read it.

However, as alleged by the Plaintiff, the staff in charge of the Gdong Office is wrong.

Even as seen earlier, since the procedure for reporting rights under Article 88 of the Civil Execution Act is not taken, it constitutes a tort in relation to the plaintiff who is not an interested party in the auction procedure

It cannot be said that there is a proximate causal relationship between the Plaintiff’s damage and the Plaintiff’s damage caused by failing to take legal measures necessary to exercise the right to preferential payment.

Therefore, we cannot accept the Plaintiff’s assertion.

If so, the judgment of the first instance is justifiable.

The plaintiff's appeal disputing this issue is rejected and dismissed.