logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.04.20 2017나106792
약정금
Text

1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.

2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

(b) In the case of an apartment complex in a residential house, the amount of KRW 18, 119, 120, 121, 112, 111, 110, 109, and 108 (in the case of an apartment complex in a residential house, the total amount of KRW 200,000 (in the case of an apartment complex in the case of an apartment complex in the middle of a residential house) excluding the sum of the down payment (at least 200,000,000) out of the total amount of the down payment (at least 20,000,000) on the total amount of KRW 118,00,000,0000, not later than May 4, 2015, the amount of KRW 240,000,000 shall be deposited to A in the period of deposit;

F It confirms that the first and second parts of the content certification is not a matter of law (legal civil or criminal) to A, and the contractor A promises not to speak that it is related to the image and defamation of the F Company.

(F) On March 4, 200, the statement about the damage to images of each other, which may be a civil or criminal issue, shall be made to comply with the promise.

Contract deposit and benefit money are to be deposited in A (Agricultural Cooperatives)*********.

F Company Representative B Representative E: ED

E. On June 12, 2015, the Plaintiff: (a) drafted a written waiver of the effect that he/she renounced all rights to the instant commercial buildings to G, an employee of F (hereinafter “instant waiver note”); (b) a certificate of the refund of the down payment that was refunded the down payment of KRW 278 million of the instant commercial buildings (hereinafter “certificate of the refund”); and (c) a certificate of the refund of the down payment (hereinafter “certificate of the refund”); and (d) the instant commercial buildings, the Plaintiff and the broker, at any objection thereafter, will not thereafter raise any criminal liability, such as civil and criminal liability when damage to the said contract occurs (hereinafter “each of the instant notes”).

F. On June 15, 2015, the Defendant remitted KRW 13,1940,00 to the Plaintiff’s account.

G. On March 17, 2016, the Plaintiff decided to return under the instant return agreement to the Defendant on March 17, 2016, the amount of KRW 18 million, out of KRW 240,000,000,000,000,000, should be paid.

arrow