The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal does not contain a fact that the defendant sold beer and beer to E who is a juvenile.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the lower court, namely, “D” operated by the Defendant, consistently from the investigative agency to the lower court, to consistently purchased beer and beer.

2. He made a statement with E; 2. He did so with E

F also stated in the court of the court below that “F shall be the same as E in this case, he shall be a juvenile, and he shall be the same as E in this case, and only E shall be the juvenile, and he shall be the juvenile in this case.” <3 When F as an emergency room of a hospital due to drinking under the influence of alcohol, the juvenile in this case becomes the juvenile in this case, the mother of F shall punish the juvenile in this case and report to the juvenile in an investigation agency, and it is difficult to find the reasons for the latter to make a false statement, and the defendant can recognize the fact that he sells alcoholic beverages to E, a juvenile in this case, and the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.