A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

On December 26, 2017, at around 09:06, the Defendant arbitrarily concealed two copies of the public notice of the general meeting of the shareholders of the apartment owned by the victim D from 101, Daegu Northern-gu building C, Daegu-gu, 101 to 202, which is the Defendant’s residence, and caused its utility.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on internal reporting (to attachCCTV images);

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion on the assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order does not lead to concealment of the notice posted on the apartment, but did not harm the utility of the public notice because it was based on the public notice put on the floor. Thus, the defendant's act does not constitute concealment, and even if the defendant's act constitutes concealment of domestic affairs, it does not constitute a justifiable act under Article 20 of the Criminal Act, which is reasonable in light of social norms.

1) As to the assertion, the following facts acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court: (i) the victim requested the apartment security guards to prepare a public notice of the general meeting and attach it to the apartment security guards; and (ii) the defendant, in light of the fact that there was a public notice posted on the floor to which the security guards are attached, even if the defendant requested the security guards to post it even though it was not a public notice notice that was already posted, so long as the victim requested the security guards to post it, the defendant's arbitrary possession of it and posting it should be deemed to have undermined the utility of the public notice of this case.

The defendant and defense counsel's allegation in this part is without merit.

2) the following: