The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (one hundred months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment that the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case and reflected against the defendant, the victim of the special injury crime of this case is seeking a preference against the defendant by mutual consent. In the case of the fraud crime of this case, the fact that the victim is seeking a preference against the defendant, and that the auction of the vehicle for the crime of fraud of this case is expected to be conducted, and it is favorable to the defendant.

However, each of the crimes of this case was committed during the period of repeated crimes after the execution of punishment was completed due to special larceny, etc., and committed the crime of special bodily injury in this case under the influence of criminal punishment several times in assault-related crimes, and taking full account of the fact that the amount obtained by deception through the crime of this case is not much significant, and other various circumstances, including the defendant's age, sex, sex, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., it cannot be deemed unfair because the court below's punishment is too excessive and unfair. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.