1. The defendant shall assist the plaintiff with Suwon District Court in regard to each real estate listed in attached list 1 to 3.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. According to the Land Survey Division written during the Japanese Occupation Period, it is written that the person who resides in the same Ri as the female-gun of Gyeonggi-do (referred to as "Bri-si, Gyeonggi-do (referred to as "Nri-si, Gyeonggi-do; hereinafter referred to as "Bri-si") Bri-si, Gyeonggi-do (referred to as "Nri-si, Gyeonggi-do) Bri-si, and Dri-si 7,002 was under the circumstances, and the Fri-si, Gyeonggi-do (referred to as "Nri-si, Gyeonggi-do) Gri-si, Gyeonggi-do (referred to as "Fri-si, Gyeonggi-do; hereinafter referred to as "Fri-si")

B. Thereafter, C 252 square meters was divided into C, I land, J or K land, G 3,756 square meters into L or M land.

C. The Defendant completed the registration of preservation of ownership as stated in Paragraph (1) of this case on the land I, N, andO (the land listed in the attached list Nos. 1 through 3, hereinafter referred to as “the land of this case”) in the order of each land listed in the attached list, and completed each registration of preservation of ownership as stated in the attached list No. 1 of this case on September 11, 1957 on the land of this case as the received No. 1574 on September 11, 1957 on the land of this case, and as for the land of this case No. 7 of this case on April 22, 1996 on the land of Suwon District Court No. 7934.

On the other hand, the plaintiff was born from Q to Q, and the plaintiff died on February 6, 1940 and succeeded to Australia.

[Ground of recognition] The non-contentious facts, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, and 7, each fact-finding with respect to the leisure market and the revised Rdong Resident Center of this Court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The plaintiff's gist of the plaintiff's assertion is the plaintiff's son, who was assessed against C and D's land and G land, and the defendant completed the registration of preservation of ownership for the land of this case divided from each of the above land without title. Thus, the plaintiff is obligated to implement the registration procedure for cancellation of the above registration of preservation of ownership.

B. The defendant's assertion 1 is that E and the plaintiff's reference, the assessment title of each land, are the same person.