logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.04.25 2016고단837
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Seized Mack (No. 11) shall be forfeited from the accused.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. On January 21, 2016, the Defendant: (a) at the first floor parking lot of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government “C” located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on January 21, 2016, the Defendant: (b) opened a front door door door box of the victim’s vehicle in order to return shopping bags; (c) opened the victim’s cash 160,000 won owned by the victim; and (d) maintained one white paper of 540,000 won at the market price of the victim’s cash 160,000 won and 5,000 won at the market price of 50,000 won in the market price; and (d) stolen another’s property in total seven times from January 18, 2016 to February 16, 2016, including the list of crimes.

2. Violation of the Act on Financial Business Specializing in credit, and fraud;

A. On February 25, 2016, around 19:54, the Defendant purchased one head of 3,000 won or more at the “G” pharmacy operated by the victim E located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and settled the price. The Defendant was issued one mack by presenting the physical card in the name of H, a stolen card, to the both of the victims as the Defendant, and signing on the signature tag.

Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving the victim and receiving property, used stolen check cards.

B. On February 25, 2016, at around 20:06, the Defendant: (a) purchased and settled the price for the purchase of up to KRW 809,00 for the 4 games operated by the victim I located in the Guro-gu Seoul High Court Decision 200:37, supra; and (b) received the payment for the purchase of the marth 4 games in the market price of KRW 809,000; (c) the Defendant presented the mar card under the name of H, the card that was stolen, to both the Defendant, and signed the mar on the signature tag and received the marth 4 game machine.

Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving the victim and receiving property, used stolen check cards.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Each statement of D, L, M, E, I, N, D, and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each police seizure protocol;

1. Each of the relevant Articles of the Act concerning the facts of crime;

arrow