(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.01.23 2013고단5514

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.01.23 2013고단5514

교통사고처리특례법위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving C, low GTS 125cc.

On July 10, 2013, the Defendant driven the above Oralba, and proceeded at a speed of about 60 km from the two-lane distance to the two-lane distance from the two-lanes along the two-lanes along the two-lanes in the two-lane dong in Daegu Suwon-gu, Daegu-gu.

At the same time, there was a crosswalk installed in the front door, so it was necessary for a person engaged in driving service to safely drive the crosswalk by reducing the speed and by properly examining the right and the right of the road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and got the victim to go beyond the road due to the shock of the victim D (the age of 65) who crosses the crosswalk from the direction of the Magsan East East East Office by pedestrian red signal. In addition, the Defendant got the victim to go beyond the road due to the shock.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the 2nd joints and the 7nd joints, which require approximately 10 weeks of treatment due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Video photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Punishment concerning Criminal Facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Although the defendant's responsibility for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the grounds of the order to provide community service and to attend a compliance driving lecture is not minor, it is recognized that the victim was at fault of crossinging the crosswalk on which the signal apparatus is installed, while the defendant was at fault, while the accident of this case occurred during the normal course according to the direct driving signals of the vehicle, and the victim was covered by mandatory insurance, and the insurance money is paid to

참조조문

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 2015.09.24 2015고단3056

-울산지방법원 2017.02.08 2016고단4677

-대구지방법원 2018.01.25 2017나309522

-대구지방법원 2013.12.11 2013고정2607

-대구지방법원 2016.11.04 2016고정1953