logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.02.06 2016고단1878
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Fraud;

A. On February 11, 2016, the Defendant: (a) took the same attitude to pay the alcohol value in spite of the intent or ability to pay the price to the injured party even if he/she received the alcohol from the injured party; and (b) was provided with alcohol and alcohol equivalent to KRW 315,00,00 in total at the market price of each week from the injured party, including two weeks.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

B. On March 31, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 17:21, the Defendant: (b) operated the frontway of the wife population G, in the Mudae-ro 241, in the name of the Republic of Korea, the Defendant, even though there was no intent or ability to pay the taxi fee; (c) was the victim as if he/she would have been on board the taxi operated by the Victim F and would have paid the fare; and (d) operated the taxi up to the He/she is in the direction of the wife population G at the time of

Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving the victim, acquired financial benefits equivalent to 24,900 won of taxi fares.

2. On February 11, 2016, the Defendant violated the D’s 112 report of the J 1st floor of the J 1st floor located in the wife population I, which was sent to the site after receiving a report of the D 112 of the J 1st floor of the J 1st floor located in the wife population I, and the Defendant prevented a suspect who seeks to leave the site without calculating the drinking value of K (47 tax) and the border M (47) of the police station in the Yongsan-dong Police Station, which was called to the site, and committed an assault, such as provokinging off his body by walkinging the bridge and the kid hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement made by a witness L;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Written statements of N and F;

1. Receipts:

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photograph damaged photographs, field photographs, and CCTV images;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of fraud) and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Suspension of execution;

arrow