logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.08.13 2014고단1661
사기
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. Facts charged;

A. On August 26, 201, the defrauded of vessel proceeds, at the opening point of the Korean bank located in the Busan Jin-gu, Busan, Busan, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim C, stating that “C is trying to dispose of the fishing vessel at D companies. The marking of USD 120,000 (hereinafter referred to as “$”) is possible due to the permit for the fishery, and the vessel is able to operate immediately. The vessel bears the burden of USD 60,000 if the vessel cost is to be borne by the vessel. The vessel will be 60,000 if it is operated in common by purchasing and operating the vessel.” In other places, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “A vessel is to be purchased as soon as possible.”

However, even if the defendant received USD 60,000 from the victim, he did not have any funds to pay the remainder of the vessel price, and did not have any intention or ability to raise the profits of the victim by operating the above vessel with the above vessel.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim as such, USD 1,100 on August 26, 201 as vessel price from the victim, and the same year.

8. USD 10,00,000 around 29.

9.8.M.S. dollars 40,000,000

9. around 28.28 US$ 5,000, and the same year.

9. Around 30.30. Around 5,000 dollars, 61,100 dollars were received and acquired by fraud.

B. Around September 8, 2011, the Defendant made a false statement to the F Office located in Yeongdeungpo-gu, Busan Metropolitan City, to the Ha, a director of the G Co., Ltd., the victim C, by calling to the Ha, who is a director of the G Co., Ltd., the victim C, and then lending USD 10,000 to the F Co., Ltd.., the Defendant: (a) attempted to borrow USD 10,000; (b) would make payment to the F Co., Ltd., the F Co., Ltd.; and (c) would make payment after one month.

However, even if the defendant received USD 10,00 from I under the contract on behalf of the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to pay it within the time limit which the victim promised to pay.

The defendant deceivings the victim as such, and is also the victim.

arrow