Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, for eight months, and for four months, for Defendant C, respectively.

except that this shall not apply.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative director of the J Co., Ltd. in Seoul, Nowon-gu, Seoul, the representative director of the L Co., Ltd. in Geumcheon-gu Seoul, and the representative director of the defendant C in Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul.

Defendant

C Around 2003, at the time of operating an OCo., Ltd., a taxi company, borrowed KRW 1 billion from Defendant A and paid interest, and re-established P Co., Ltd., a taxi company, and succeeded to the above debt. On April 26, 201, Defendant B borrowed KRW 500 million from Defendant B, and continued to conduct the above P Co., Ltd, as Defendant B’s representative director on December 23, 2009 from Q, which was known to Pyeongtaek, borrowed KRW 10 million on November 12, 2010, and KRW 500 million on January 27, 2012.

1. On November 1, 2012, Defendant A and B attempted to commit occupational breach of trust, at the office of Defendant A located in Nowon-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City on November 1, 201, Defendant A agreed to take over the obligation of KRW 1 billion that Defendant A borrowed to Defendant C from Defendant C from the Victim L corporation. As such, Defendant A was requested to transfer the Plaintiff’s taxi business license and the vehicle as a means of securing the said obligation.

At the time, the number of the taxi vehicles of the victim LA company reaches 66, and the value of the business license and the vehicle for 1 taxi is at least 50 million won, and the economic value for 66 vehicles is at least 3.3 billion won. As such, Defendant B, the representative director of the victim company, should provide only the debt amounting to 1 billion won and the property equivalent to the interest thereof, and there was a duty to not transfer 66 taxi business license and the business license with a value of at least 3.3 billion won exceeding the debt amount.

Nevertheless, Defendant B's 66 vehicles and the taxi driver's license of the victim company from Defendant A.