1. At the same time, the Defendant received KRW 480,000,000 from each of the Plaintiffs, and simultaneously received them from the Plaintiffs:

(a) the annexed list;

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On September 13, 2016, the Plaintiffs purchased real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant land”) from the Defendant for KRW 1 billion (hereinafter “instant sales contract”), and paid KRW 40 million to the Defendant on the same day (hereinafter “instant sales contract”). The Plaintiffs agreed to pay the remainder KRW 960 million to the Defendant by December 31, 2016.

In the instant sales contract, the Defendant received the remaining balance of KRW 960 million from the Plaintiffs, and at the same time agreed to the Plaintiffs to implement the registration procedure for ownership transfer of the instant land, and agreed to remove the grounds for restricting the exercise of ownership, such as mortgages, superficies, and chonsegwon, which were established on the instant land before the payment date of the remainder.

In addition, the Plaintiffs and the Defendant concluded the instant sales contract, and concluded the following special agreements:

Matters of special agreement

A. At the same time as the sales contract of this case, the defendant shall deliver a written consent for land use to the plaintiffs or the plaintiffs designated.

B. The defendant recognizes the development of the land of this case by the plaintiffs, and actively cooperate in the matters requested by the plaintiffs for the development of land division, merger, etc.

C. After obtaining a building permit, the Plaintiffs provide security without any condition when they request the provision of security for the payment of remainder.

However, in this case, it shall be limited to a case where the full purchase price is paid at the same time as a loan.

(Omission)

E. At the same time as the instant sales contract, consent to the implementation and completion of restoration or a large amount of restoration, which is a premise for obtaining permission for the instant land, and where the construction permission is delayed due to the delay of administrative agencies, not intentional errors by the Plaintiffs, the remaining payment date shall be extended up to the extended period. The instant contract becomes null and void and the down payment already paid shall be refunded at the time of

B. On September 20, 2016, the Defendant rendered the instant land to the Plaintiffs.