1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months;

2. Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, on December 22, 1997, entered into a check contract with the inside branch of the Industrial Bank of Korea and entered into a check contract with the inside branch of the Industrial Bank of Korea and entered into a transaction on the number of units.

On November 30, 2014, the Defendant issued a copy of check number D, face value D, issuance date, and one copy of the check number per unit in the name of the Defendant as “D”, “the face value KRW 200,000”, and “ February 28, 2015,” and issued the same year within the time limit for presentment for payment by the holder of the check.

3.2. Around February, the above check was presented to the above branch, but the above check was not to be paid as a disposition of suspension of transaction, and the check was issued in the name of the defendant 4, the total face value per share, 70,000,000 won as stated in the attached list Nos. 3 through 6, and each check was presented for payment to the above branch, but each check was not paid for reasons such as shortage of deposit.

around December 22, 1997, the Defendant entered into a check contract with the inside branch of the Industrial Bank of Korea and entered into a check contract with the Defendant on December 22, 1997.

around 15:00 on December 30, 2014, the Defendant issued one copy of the check number per bank in the name of the Defendant as “E”, “one million won per check amount”, and “one copy of the check number per bank issued on April 30, 2015,” and presented the check to the above branch on April 30, 2015 during the period for which the check was presented, but the check number was not paid as suspension of transaction.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each statute on a written accusation;

1. Article 2 (2) and (1) of the Control of Illegal Check Control Act with Respect to the facts constituting an offense and Article 2 (2) and (1) of the Act on the Selection of Penalties;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is that the Defendant has harmed the trust in the transaction of checks due to the instant crime, and that the check has not been recovered.