beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for a year, respectively.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On July 2016, the Defendants gathered to drink food purchased at the department stores, large marinas, and convenience stores, etc., and to obtain money from small food companies in the name of agreement from small and medium food companies.
Defendant
A around August 5, 2016, in EKafin located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, "G, a staff member in charge of the Fund for the Adjustment of Victims to the Settlement of Victims", "G, around July 27, 2016, had the original copy supplied to H stores by the Party, and the wife (Defendant B), who was pregnant, was born.
It will not be a problem any more than one million won under the pretext of agreement.
“Falsely speaking, Defendant B showed the hospital’s opinion to the above G.
However, in fact, Defendant B did not have any fact of drinking the above decoration, and Defendant B had no time prior to the time when the above decoration was purchased due to around July 2016, and thus, Defendant B did not have any opinion that Defendant B presented to said G. The Defendants continued to have economic difficulties due to Defendant A’s illegal sports gambling, etc., the Defendants attempted to drink the food of the food of the relevant company against the small food business entities and obtain money by fraud in the name of the agreed money.
The Defendants deceiving the victims as above and received KRW 1 million from the victims, namely, from the victims, to the Saemaul Bank Account (I) in the name of Defendant A, under the pretext of agreement, from the victims, and by deceiving the victims, who are food enterprises, which were 29 times in total, as shown in the attached crime list in the same manner from around that time to October 10, 2016, and received KRW 13,209,700 in total from the victims in cash or in direct cash, etc.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to induce victims to receive property from the victims.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant B